Why are the Olympic torch carriers not heavily armed?
We've all heard about the recent struggles the Olympic torch bearers have had trying to keep the torch lit and on course toward Beijing. Well, we can thank the filthy hippies of San Francisco once again for screwing things up in this country. First, the gays, now this. So a couple of left wing extremists risked their lives and climbed up onto a extremely high extension bridge in San Francisco to hang up a sign to get their point across about Tibet. Big deal. Where is Tibet anyway? I'm not sure, but I'm pretty sure it is not one of the 50 states of America. What IS a big deal to me is messing with the Olympic Torch! What they should do is heavily arm the Torch carriers. Then, when one of those Tibetan freedom fighters carrying a glass of water or a long-haired hippie-freak toting a book or a thick block of extremely good cheese tries to mess with the torch, the torch carrier can protect the flame. With bullets. Rubber bullets of course, I'm not an animal. That should shut up those sign-makers. So, if you're dumb enough to jump in front of the torch, expect rubber bouncing of your chest at a high velocity fired from a semi-automatic weapon at point blank range. If I was a torch carrier, I'd go with a hand gun. Less bulky. A rifle IS a more precise shot though.
So ARM the runners and there will be no more wasting of our police officers time guarding the torch. Last resort, we can always hire that great American, Erik Prince, and his bad asses at Blackwater, to guard the Olympic Torch. It would be great training for the mercenary work they do in Iraq. Protester grabs the Torch. We grab our guns. Eat my rubber, you pacifist pussy.


